Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 161: D945, 2017.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28351435

RESUMO

We have recently shown that costs of surgical treatment for colorectal carcinoma differ greatly between various patient groups in the Netherlands. Those cost-differences could mostly be explained by the fact that high-risk patients have a greater risk of complications, which generate higher hospital costs. Hospitals with a high-risk population, for instant tertiary referral centres, spend more than hospitals that treat low-risk patients. Currently reimbursement however is not geared to risk differences. In this article we investigate this shortcoming of the current reimbursement system and discuss how a differential rewarding - in which reimbursement is aligned with the patient's risk profile - could serve as a tool to further quality improvement in healthcare. Current clinical registries may provide the necessary details of patient characteristics for risk profiling and may also contribute to the following goal: reimbursement based on the quality of delivered care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Custos Hospitalares , Sistema de Registros , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Países Baixos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA